Legislator Rechtsdatenbank & Rechtsprechung
DE FR IT EN
Gerichtsentscheide Legislation In Legislator analysieren
I 2021 3 • VG SZ I 2021 3 Abgewiesen (Dismissed) KI-strukturiert

I 2021 3 — Accident Insurance Benefits Causality Dispute

Geschäftsnummer I 2021 3 (SZ_VG_003_I-2021-3_2021-04-12)
Gericht / Behörde
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Rechtsordnung Kanton Schwyz — Kantonale Gerichte (CH-SZ)
Originalquelle öffnen ↗ Entscheidsuche-Spiegel ↗ Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Zusammenfassung (Sachverhalt & Erwägungen)

KI-strukturiert

A complainant appealed a decision regarding accident insurance benefits, disputing the causal link between an accident and a listed diagnosis for which benefits were claimed. The court, in its decision, upheld the prior ruling, reasoning that although the accident occurred, the evidence did not establish the requisite medical causality between the initial incident and the subsequent listed diagnosis to mandate the insurer's liability for the claimed benefits.

Leitsatz / Regeste

KI-strukturiert
A complainant appealed a decision regarding accident insurance benefits, disputing the causal link between an accident and a listed diagnosis for which benefits were claimed. The court, in its decision, upheld the prior ruling, reasoning that although the accident occurred, the evidence did not establish the requisite medical causality between the initial incident and the subsequent listed diagnosis to mandate the insurer's liability for the claimed benefits.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext des Entscheids — I 2021 3

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2021 3 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. April 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Tanja Marty, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Unfallversicherung (Unfallkausalität; Leistungspflicht aus \n Listendiagnose