Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Sklep VIII DoR 5/2009-6 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:VIII.DOR.5.2009.6 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses review application because applicant failed to meet statutory admissibility conditions under ZPP Article 367a.

Geschäftsnummer Sklep VIII DoR 5/2009-6
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Slowenien (SI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request to permit a review of the second-instance judgment. The applicant sought to overturn a decision denying their claim for unpaid tax deducted from family pension, arguing the lower court erred in law. The court dismissed the request because the applicant failed to demonstrate that the conditions for admissibility under Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure were met.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure; A review application is inadmissible if the applicant fails to establish the statutory conditions for its permission under Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
review application admissibility conditions Code of Civil Procedure tax deduction family pension Abänderung des nachehelichen Unterhalts Entzug von Sozialversicherungsleistungen Mietzinsabzug bei Ergänzungsleistungen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 367c of the Code of Civil Procedure
KI-generiert
VDSS sodba Psp 108/2012
Social court dismisses appeal, ruling pension calculation must use most favorable variant for claimant rights.
VDSS sodba Psp 178/2016
Appeal dismissed; prior court reversal does not constitute unlawful conduct for pension recalculation claims.
VSRS Sodba VIII Ips 114/2018
Supreme Court dismisses pension revision appeal, upholding final 1999 pension decision against retroactive claims.
Sklep VIII Ips 266/2010
Supreme Court allows review, voids lower court ruling on unpaid funds and interest due to unjust enrichment.
VDSS Sodba Psp 129/2022
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff lacks required pension contribution history to meet statutory retirement age conditions.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Za dopustitev revizije mora stranka izkazati obstoj pogojev iz 367a. člena ZPP.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Tožeča stranka je vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje, s katero je bilo ugodeno pritožbi tožene stranke in sodba sodišča prve stopnje spremenjena tako, da se zahtevek tožeče stranke za plačilo odtegnjenega zneska dohodnine, obračunane pri izplačilu družinske pokojnine tožnikoma, zavrne.

2. Ker pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367a. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) niso podani, je Vrhovno sodišče na podlagi prvega in drugega odstavka 367c. člena ZPP predlog zavrnilo.