Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Sklep II Dor 21/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.21.2009 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses revision request due to failure to meet statutory conditions under Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act.

Geschäftsnummer Sklep II Dor 21/2009
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Slowenien (SI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request for permission to file a revision against the second-instance judgment. The applicant sought to challenge the partial denial of an alimony increase, arguing procedural errors in the lower courts' decisions. The court dismissed the request because the applicant failed to satisfy the specific conditions required by Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act; A revision request is inadmissible if the applicant fails to demonstrate that the lower court's decision violates the law or contains a significant error in fact-finding.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
revision request Civil Procedure Act alimony increase second instance judgment statutory conditions Revisionsgründe Nutzungsplanrevision Vertragsänderung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act
KI-generiert
Sklep III DoR 42/2012
Appeal dismissed partially; Supreme Court allows review regarding procedural violation on claim amount.
Sklep II DoR 185/2010
Supreme Court dismisses late application for leave to appeal as it was filed outside the 30-day statutory deadline.
Sklep III DoR 36/2012
Supreme Court allows appeal regarding whether a contract terminated before bankruptcy counts as a mutual breach under ZFPPIPP Article 24.
Sklep II DoR 551/2010
Supreme Court dismisses appeal request due to late payment of court fees under ZPP Article 105a(3).
Sklep X Ips 860/2007
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for lack of serious legal issue and severe consequences under Administrative Dispute Resolution Act.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Vrhovno sodišče je predlog zavrnilo, ker niso podani pogoji iz 367.a člena Zakona pravdnem postopku.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Toženec je vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje s katero je bilo delno ugodeno tožnikovi pritožbi proti zavrnilnemu delu prvostopenjske sodbe v zvezi z zahtevanim zvišanjem preživnine.

2. Vrhovno sodišče je predlog zavrnilo, ker niso podani pogoji iz 367.a člena Zakona pravdnem postopku.