Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Sklep II Dor 9/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.9.2009 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses review application as statutory conditions for admissibility under ZPP are not met.

Geschäftsnummer Sklep II Dor 9/2009
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Slowenien (SI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the defendant's request to admit a review against the second-instance judgment. The defendant argued for overturning the lower court's order to remove encroachments on the plaintiff's property, but the court found the statutory prerequisites for a review under Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure were absent. Consequently, the application was dismissed because the necessary conditions for granting a review were not satisfied.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure; A review application is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for its admission under the first paragraph of Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure are not met.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Code of Civil Procedure review application admissibility conditions property rights encroachment removal Revisionsverfahren Besitzesstörungsklage Nutzungsplanrevision

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure
KI-generiert
Sodba III Ips 73/2010
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against bank liability for fraud where documents appeared genuine and AML reporting was complete.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 78/2022
Supreme Court dismisses appeal request due to lack of standing for non-lawyer applicant.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 536/2020
Appeal dismissed because applicant failed to prove she holds a valid lawyer's state exam license.
VSL Sklep II Cp 1014/2019
Appeal dismissed; non-lawyer self-representation in Supreme Court review rejected under ZPP rules.
VSL Sodba II Cp 749/2020
Appeal court reverses first instance ruling, dismissing plaintiff's claim for ownership based on adverse possession and contract ratification.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367. a člena ZPP niso podani.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Toženec je vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje, s katero je bila zavrnjena njegova pritožba zoper sodbo sodišča prve stopnje, s katero mu je bilo naloženo opustiti vsakršno poseganje v lastninsko pravico tožnice na parceli št. 1593 k.o. ... ter v okviru tega odstraniti kole in žično ograjo s severnega dela navedene parcele ob parcelah št. 1591 in 1592.

2. Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367. a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju: ZPP) niso podani. Vrhovno sodišče je zato predlog zavrnilo (tretji odstavek 367. člena ZPP).