Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
Sodba II Ips 951/2006 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2008:II.IPS.951.2006 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses appeal upholding buyer's title over seller's defective ownership in enforcement proceedings.

Geschäftsnummer Sodba II Ips 951/2006
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Slowenien (SI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the appellant's appeal, confirming the lower courts' decision that the enforcement buyer acquired original ownership rights. The appellant, a co-owner, argued that the court erred in allowing a sale by a non-disposing co-owner and failed to provide clear reasoning. The court ruled that the enforcement sale was legally effective because the buyer acted in good faith and the land registry's protection of bona fide acquisition takes precedence over the co-owner's lack of disposal capacity.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Article 42 of the Property Act; Article 10 of the Property Act; Article 8 of the Land Register Act: Original ownership is acquired by a buyer in enforcement proceedings if the buyer acts in good faith, and the protection of bona fide acquisition in the land registry prevails over the seller's lack of disposal capacity.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
enforcement proceedings original ownership acquisition lack of disposal capacity bona fide acquisition land registry protection co-owner rights property law bisheriger Rechtsstatus

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Article 42 of the Property Act
Article 10 of the Property Act
Article 8 of the Land Register Act
Article 14, paragraph 2, point 2 of Section 339 of the Act on Civil Procedure
Article 165, paragraph 1 of the Act on Civil Procedure
Article 154, paragraph 1 of the Act on Civil Procedure

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
Case II Ips 505/2003
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Revizija se zavrne.

Tožeča stranka mora toženi stranki v 15 dneh povrniti 465,18 EUR stroškov odgovora na revizijo z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi, ki tečejo od 16. dne od vročitve te sodbe.

[JEDRO]

Tožeča stranka je sicer lastniški posestnik spornega stanovanja, na njem pa zaradi pomanjkanja razpolagalne sposobnosti prodajalcev ni mogla pridobiti lastninske pravice, zato je treba dati prednost toženi stranki – kupcu stanovanja v izvršilnem postopku, ki je na njem izvirno pridobila lastninsko pravico.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]