Arbetsdomstolen allowed wage claim because defendant failed to respond to a court order.
Schweden (SE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Arbitration Court of Sweden allowed the plaintiff's wage claim against the defendant company. The plaintiff argued that the defendant failed to respond to a court order to answer the case, which constituted a procedural violation. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, holding that the defendant's failure to comply with the order justified the award of the claimed wages.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArbetsdomstolans reg. 10 kap. 1 § ArbL; Arbetsdomstolans reg. 10 kap. 2 § ArbL: A failure by a respondent to answer a court order to respond to the case constitutes grounds for the court to allow the claimant's wage claim.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Svenska Transportarbetareförbundet
mot
Lea No 2 AB.
Målet gällde lönefordran m.m. Domen innebar att kärandens talan bifölls på grund av att svaranden underlåtit att följa ett föreläggande att avge svaromål.
Dom 2019-11-27, målnummer A-67-2019
Ledamot: Sören Öman
Rättssekreterare: Peter Edin