Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
Încheierea nr. 7162/2012 KI-generiert

Change of venue denied in pending civil suit over partiality concerns

Geschäftsnummer Încheierea nr. 7162/2012
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Rumänien (RO)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the applicant’s request to transfer case file no. 18181/233/2012 from the Galați District Court to another court, with no further appeal available; the underlying litigation remains pending in the original court. The applicant had sought the transfer (strămutare) of the civil case, arguing grounds for mistrust or suspicion of partiality, while the prosecutor opposed the motion. The court, applying the procedural rules governing change of venue, found no legal basis to justify the transfer and dismissed the application in a closed-chamber session, pronouncing the decision in public hearing.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 93 al. 1 LTF; Change of venue denied in pending civil suit over partiality concerns: 18181/233/2012 from the Galați District Court to another court, with no further appeal available; the underlying litigation remains pending in the original court. The applicant had sought the transfer (strămutare) of the civil case, arguing grounds for mistrust or suspicion of partiality, while the prosecutor opposed the motion. The court, applying the procedural rules governing change of venue, found no legal basis to justify the transfer and dismissed the application in a closed-chamber session, pronouncing the decision in public hearing.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Nichtigkeitsgründe Verfahrensrügen zivilrechtlicher Kompetenzkonflikt öffentliche Verhandlung E-Justice Praxisänderung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 93 al. 1 LTF
The dispositive dismisses the request for transfer of the case, and the article is cited as the basis for the decision.
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 93 al. 1 LTF

The dispositive dismisses the request for transfer of the case, and the article is cited as the basis for the decision.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

S-a luat în examinare cererea formulată de petenta D.V.A. prin care solicită strămutarea cauzei ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 18181/233/2012 al Judecătoriei Galați.

La apelul nominal lipsesc petenta și intimata D.L.

Ministerul Public este reprezentat de procuror A.B.

Procedura este legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată al instanțelor, Dosarul nr. 18181/233/2012 al Judecătoriei Galați, a cărui strămutare se cere, are termen de judecată la data de 2 aprilie 2013.

Procurorul pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenta D.V.A. prin care solicită strămutarea cauzei ce formează obiectul dosarului nr. 18181/233/2012 al Judecătoriei Galați.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 21 noiembrie 2012.

Procesat de GGC - AS