Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Încheierea nr. 1818/2013 KI-generiert

Legitimate suspicion upheld: retrial moved to Târgoviște Court, prior acts preserved.

Geschäftsnummer Încheierea nr. 1818/2013
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Rumänien (RO)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Civil Section I) granted the petition for case transfer, moving the case (Dosar nr. 2866/268/2012) from the Odorheiu Secuiesc Court to the Târgoviște Court, while preserving all procedural acts already completed; the ruling is final and without appeal, meaning the transferee court will continue the proceedings. The petition invoked legitimate suspicion of bias, based on written grounds supported by submitted documents, and the court heard the petitioner's representative (who sought admission) and the Public Ministry (which argued for rejection as unfounded). The decision rests on the statutory framework for case transfer due to legitimate suspicion (strămutare), requiring objective reasons that could undermine public confidence in impartial justice, which the court found satisfied.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 36 BüG, Art. 93 BGG; Legitimate suspicion upheld: retrial moved to Târgoviște Court, prior acts preserved: 2866/268/2012) from the Odorheiu Secuiesc Court to the Târgoviște Court, while preserving all procedural acts already completed; the ruling is final and without appeal, meaning the transferee court will continue the proceedings. The petition invoked legitimate suspicion of bias, based on written grounds supported by submitted documents, and the court heard the petitioner's representative (who sought admission) and the Public Ministry (which argued for rejection as unfounded). The decision rests on the statutory framework for case transfer due to legitimate suspicion (strămutare), requiring objective reasons that could undermine public confidence in impartial justice, which the court found satisfied.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Nichtigkeitsgründe berechtigter Anschein der Befangenheit Kompetenzübertragung Zivilurteil Beweisübernahme Rahmenbeschluss

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 36 BüG
Basis for annulment of naturalization due to concealment of facts.
Art. 93 BGG
Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because it was against an interlocutory decision.
KI-generiert
Decizia nr. 610/2016
Transfer of case for legitimate suspicion granted; Bucharest Court of Appeal vested to hear transfer request.
Încheierea nr. 1331/2013
Transfer to Hunedoara Tribunal granted over impartiality fears; prior acts preserved.
Decizia nr. 1757/2021
Transfer of civil case based on legitimate suspicion: jurisdiction of High Court versus Court of Appeal
Decizia nr. 3492/2014
Legitimate-suspicion case transfer referred to Bucharest Court of Appeal
Încheierea nr. 7123/2012
Legitimate suspicion and transfer of civil case venue to a court of equal rank

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 36 BüG

Basis for annulment of naturalization due to concealment of facts.

Art. 93 BGG

Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because it was against an interlocutory decision.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Se referă de către magistratul asistent că, potrivit ECRIS, sistemul național de gestiune informatică a dosarelor, Dosarul nr. 2866/268/2012 al Judecătoriei Odorheiu Secuiesc, a cărui strămutare se solicită, are termen de judecată la 11 aprilie 2013.

Având cuvântul cu privire la cererea de strămutare, reprezentantul petentului solicită admiterea cererii, susținând oral motivele de bănuială legitimă expuse în scris. Depune la dosar un set de înscrisuri în susținerea cererii.

Reprezentantul Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare, ca neîntemeiată.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Admite cererea formulată de petenta G.C.K. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 2866/268/2012 al Judecătoriei Odorheiu Secuiesc.

Strămută judecata cauzei de la Judecătoria Odorheiu Secuiesc la Judecătoria Târgoviște.

Păstrează actele de procedură îndeplinite înainte de strămutare.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 1 aprilie 2013.