Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
Încheierea nr. 511/2013 KI-generiert

Motion to transfer venue admitted; case reassigned to Zalău District Court with prior acts preserved.

Geschäftsnummer Încheierea nr. 511/2013
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Rumänien (RO)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the motion to transfer venue filed by the petitioner, ordering that the civil case underlying File No. 3117/246/2012 be transferred from the Ineu District Court to the Zalău District Court, while preserving all acts performed before the transfer; this decision is final and without appeal. The case arose from a request by a company's branch to relocate a pending civil proceeding, with the assigned judge and the Public Ministry supporting the motion. Legally, the court applied the provisions on case transfer under the applicable civil procedure code, considering the procedural posture (the underlying file had been stayed) and the grounds favoring a change of venue, with the Ministerul Public concurring in the admission of the request.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ; Motion to transfer venue admitted; case reassigned to Zalău District Court with prior acts preserved: 3117/246/2012 be transferred from the Ineu District Court to the Zalău District Court, while preserving all acts performed before the transfer; this decision is final and without appeal. The case arose from a request by a company's branch to relocate a pending civil proceeding, with the assigned judge and the Public Ministry supporting the motion. Legally, the court applied the provisions on case transfer under the applicable civil procedure code, considering the procedural posture (the underlying file had been stayed) and the grounds favoring a change of venue, with the Ministerul Public concurring in the admission of the request.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Zivilprozessordnung Nichtigkeitsgründe prozessleitende Verfügungen Übertragung der Miete polizeilicher Grund E-Justice

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ.

Cited in the reasoning to note the case was suspended; not cited in the dispositive orders.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

S-a luat în examinare cererea de strămutare formulată de petenta SC R.I.F.N. SA - sucursala Arad.

La apelul nominal lipsesc petenta SC R.I.F.N. SA - sucursala Arad, intimații I.L., B.E.J. - D.D.M.

Ministerul Public este reprezentat de procuror L.V.

Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, dosarul ce face obiectul cererii de strămutare a fost suspendat în temeiul dispozițiilor art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ. din data de 29 noiembrie 2012.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public pune concluzii de admitere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Admite cererea formulată de petenta SC R.I.F.N. SA - sucursala Arad privind strămutarea procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 3117/246/2012 al Judecătoriei Ineu.

Strămută judecata cauzei de la Judecătoria Ineu la Judecătoria Zalău.

Păstrează actele îndeplinite de instanță înainte de strămutare.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi, 6 februarie 2013.