Transfer of civil case jurisdiction denied for lack of procedural grounds despite scheduling conflict

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the petitioner's request for the transfer (strămutare) of the case from the Constanța Court of Appeal, ruling that the procedural requirements for such a transfer were not met and the dispute did not warrant it. The case involved a motion by a litigant to move a civil case due to scheduling conflicts identified in the court's information system, where the prosecutor argued for dismissal, leading the court to conclude that the legal grounds for transferring the docket were absent. The decision relied on the procedural framework governing case transfers between courts, determining that the mere existence of a future hearing date did not constitute a valid basis for changing the venue, resulting in the continuation of the proceedings in the original jurisdiction without further appeal available.