Motion to transfer jurisdiction between courts for commercial case: denial for lack of statutory grounds

**Operative Outcome**: The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Section for Civil Matters) dismissed the application to transfer a case file, ruling that the procedural prerequisites for such a transfer were not met; this decision is final and not subject to appeal. **Dispute and Facts**: The applicant, a joint-stock company, filed a motion to transfer a pending commercial case from the Reșița County Court to another jurisdiction, while the prosecutor opposed the request. **Legal Basis**: The court relied on Article 111 of the Civil Procedure Code (as applicable in 2012), which governs *strămutare* (transfer of jurisdiction), requiring specific grounds such as personal bias of judges or public order concerns that cannot be remedied by recusal. The court found no such statutory grounds existed to justify deviating from the ordinary territorial jurisdiction, thus upholding the principle of legal certainty and stable jurisdictional assignment.