Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
ICCJ_87067 KI-generiert

Environmental-tax EU-compatibility referral inadmissible under preliminary-ruling rules

Geschäftsnummer ICCJ_87067
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Rumänien (RO)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral filed by the Constanța Court of Appeal seeking a preliminary ruling on whether the provisions of Government Emergency Ordinance No. 9/2013 on the environmental stamp duty for motor vehicles, as approved and amended by Law No. 37/2014, are discriminatory in relation to conflicting EU provisions. The dispute arose in a case challenging the environmental tax, with the referring court asking the High Court to resolve the legal question of the tax's compatibility with EU law. The Court held the referral inadmissible under procedural rules governing preliminary rulings on points of law, making the decision binding pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, thereby leaving the referral without a substantive ruling on the merits.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

art.521 alin.(3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Environmental-tax EU-compatibility referral inadmissible under preliminary-ruling rules: 9/2013 on the environmental stamp duty for motor vehicles, as approved and amended by Law No. 37/2014, are discriminatory in relation to conflicting EU provisions. The dispute arose in a case challenging the environmental tax, with the referring court asking the High Court to resolve the legal question of the tax's compatibility with EU law. The Court held the referral inadmissible under procedural rules governing preliminary rulings on points of law, making the decision binding pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, thereby leaving the referral without a substantive ruling on the merits.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Vorabentscheidungsverfahren Umweltsteuer Stempelabgabe Vorentscheid Vereinbarkeitsvorschriften ZPO-Bestimmung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
art.521 alin.(3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to declare the decision binding, as the ruling is a preliminary ruling for the resolution of a question of law.
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art.521 alin.(3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to declare the decision binding, as the ruling is a preliminary ruling for the resolution of a question of law.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 11 Dosar nr.7/1/2014/HP/C

Şedinţa de la 20 octombrie 2014

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Constanţa – Secţia a II-a civilă, de contencios administrativ şi fiscal în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la problema de drept privind caracterul discriminatoriu al dispoziţiilor cuprinse în Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr.9/2013 privind timbrul de mediu pentru autovehicule, aprobată cu modificări şi completări prin Legea nr.37/2014, cu modificările ulterioare, în raportare la dispoziţiile comunitare cu care intră în conflict.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art.521 alin.(3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 20 octombrie 2014