Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
ICCJ_87063 KI-generiert

Preliminary ruling referral on probation-breach authority under Article 215(8) dismissed as inadmissible; prior decision stands

Geschäftsnummer ICCJ_87063
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Rumänien (RO)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral by the Bucharest Court of Appeal seeking a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Article 215(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure—specifically, whether, during criminal investigation, the authority to impose new obligations on the suspect or to modify or terminate previously imposed ones rests with the liberty-restriction judge who ordered the measure or with the prosecutor. The referral was rejected without addressing the merits, and the decision is binding from its publication in the Official Gazette of Romania under Article 477(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure; consequently, the prior ruling remains in force and no substantive clarification was issued.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

art.477 alin.(3) din Codul de procedură penală; Preliminary ruling referral on probation-breach authority under Article 215(8) dismissed as inadmissible; prior decision stands: The referral was rejected without addressing the merits, and the decision is binding from its publication in the Official Gazette of Romania under Article 477(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure; consequently, the prior ruling remains in force and no substantive clarification was issued.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Vorabentscheidungsverfahren Wirkungen der Vorabentscheidungsurteile Probezeitkündigung Strafprozessordnung Rückweisungsentscheid Beschwerdelegitimation

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
art.477 alin.(3) din Codul de procedură penală
Makes the decision binding from the date of publication in the Official Gazette.
KI-generiert
ICCJ_119954
Preliminary ruling referral by Court of Appeal rejected as inadmissible; no binding ruling on appellate nullity and retrial powers.
ICCJ_185456
Preliminary ruling referral on revision against merits-lacking final decision held inadmissible.
ICCJ_126958
Standing to annul final criminal ruling barred in preliminary reference; referral inadmissible
Decizia nr. 17/2017
Preliminary ruling referral rejected as inadmissible due to prior binding precedent and lack of merit-determining effect.
ICCJ_178583
Admissibility of preliminary ruling request on statutory composition of penal appellate courts

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art.477 alin.(3) din Codul de procedură penală

Makes the decision binding from the date of publication in the Official Gazette.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

COMPLETUL PENTRU DEZLEGAREA UNOR CHESTIUNI DE DREPT ÎN MATERIE PENALĂ

Minuta deciziei nr. 17 Dosar nr. 21/1/2014/HP/P

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Bucureşti, Secţia I Penală în dosarul nr. 8526/3/2014 (1510/2014) privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea chestiunii de drept referitoare la interpretarea dispoziţiilor art.215 al.8 din Codul de procedură penală, în sensul de a lămuri dacă în cursul urmăririi penale, competenţa de a dispune asupra unor noi obligaţii pentru inculpat ori înlocuirea sau încetarea celor dispuse iniţial revine judecătorului de drepturi şi libertăţi care a luat măsura sau, dimpotrivă, procurorului.

Obligatorie de la data publicării în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, potrivit art.477 alin.(3) din Codul de procedură penală.

Pronunţată, în şedinţă publică, astăzi 1 septembrie 2014.