Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
ICCJ_86957 KI-generiert

Preliminary ruling referral on restitution law interplay rejected as inadmissible.

Geschäftsnummer ICCJ_86957
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Rumänien (RO)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected as inadmissible the referral from the Court of Appeal of Iași seeking a preliminary ruling on the interpretation and application of Articles 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 27, 31, 33, and 35 of Law No. 165/2013, as amended, in relation to Laws No. 10/2001 and No. 247/2005 regarding restitution of property in cases pending before courts. The referral was dismissed as inadmissible, meaning the lower court's request for a preliminary ruling was not accepted on procedural grounds. The dispute involved a request for clarification on how the 2013 restitution framework law interacts with earlier restitution laws in pending cases. The decisive legal basis was the procedural inadmissibility of the referral under the rules governing preliminary rulings, specifically failing to meet the admissibility criteria for such referrals, with the decision rendered binding pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code (Law No. 134/2010).

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

art. 35 din Legea nr. 165/2013; Preliminary ruling referral on restitution law interplay rejected as inadmissible: 165/2013, as amended, in relation to Laws No. 10/2001 and No. 247/2005 regarding restitution of property in cases pending before courts. The referral was dismissed as inadmissible, meaning the lower court's request for a preliminary ruling was not accepted on procedural grounds. The dispute involved a request for clarification on how the 2013 restitution framework law interacts with earlier restitution laws in pending cases. The decisive legal basis was the procedural inadmissibility of the referral under the rules governing preliminary rulings, specifically failing to meet the admissibility criteria for such referrals, with the decision rendered binding pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code (Law No. 134/2010).

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Vorabentscheidungsverfahren Rückerstattung des Eigentums Vorentscheid Nichtigkeitsgründe Gesetzesauslegung ZPO-Bestimmung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
art. 35 din Legea nr. 165/2013
33, art. 35 din Legea nr. 165/2013 cu modificările si completările ulterioare, pentru cauzele aflate pe rolul instanţelor, raportat la dispoziţiile Legii nr.
KI-generiert
ICCJ_156003
Preliminary property-restitution referral dismissed as inadmissible; deadlines left uninterpreted
ICCJ_140169
Preliminary ruling referral inadmissible; courts cannot substitute judgment for restitution order under Law 165/2013.
ICCJ_187724
Restitution referral on Law 165/2013 valuation held inadmissible.
ICCJ_201038
Preliminary ruling referral inadmissible for lacking genuine interpretive difficulty; prior land restitution decisions stand.
ICCJ_155123
Inadmissibility of preliminary ruling request on restitution priority and compulsory land compensation under Law 165/2013

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedura civila adoptat prin Legea nr. 134/2010

Declared the referral binding and mandatory for the courts.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE SI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 8 Dosar nr. 6/1/2014/HP/C

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge ca inadmisibila sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Iaşi, în dosarul nr. 11361/99/2011*, privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea modului de interpretare si aplicare a dispoziţiilor art. 4, art. 5, art. 6, art. 7, art. 8, art. 9, art. 11, art. 12, art. 14, art. 16, art. 17, art. 20, art. 21, art. 22, art. 24, art. 25, art. 27, art. 31, art. 33, art. 35 din Legea nr. 165/2013 cu modificările si completările ulterioare, pentru cauzele aflate pe rolul instanţelor, raportat la dispoziţiile Legii nr. 10/2001 republicata, cu modificările si completările ulterioare si ale Legii nr. 247/2005 cu modificările si completările ulterioare.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedura civila adoptat prin Legea nr. 134/2010.

Pronunţata în ședința publică, astăzi 7 iulie 2014.