Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
Încheierea nr. 5948/2012 KI-generiert

Transfer motion moot after underlying case decided; request denied

Geschäftsnummer Încheierea nr. 5948/2012
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Rumänien (RO)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Civil Section I) dismissed the motion to transfer case file no. 7540/318/2010 from the Târgu-Jiu District Court, filed by the petitioner company, ruling that the request had become moot because the underlying case had already been decided on 6 September 2012, as confirmed by the petitioner's own letter of 1 October 2012. The court acted on the procedural doctrine that a transfer motion is pointless once the case is resolved, and the dismissal is final with no appeal available.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 C.pr.civ; Transfer motion moot after underlying case decided; request denied: 7540/318/2010 from the Târgu-Jiu District Court, filed by the petitioner company, ruling that the request had become moot because the underlying case had already been decided on 6 September 2012, as confirmed by the petitioner's own letter of 1 October 2012. The court acted on the procedural doctrine that a transfer motion is pointless once the case is resolved, and the dismissal is final with no appeal available.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Gegenstandslosigkeit der Überstellung Zivilurteil Rückzug des Rechtsbegehrens Entscheidungen über die Umsetzung oder Versetzung Handänderung Obhutsübertragung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 C.pr.civ
The dispositive rejects the request for transfer of the case, a decision based on the procedural grounds for transfer requests.
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 C.pr.civ.

The dispositive rejects the request for transfer of the case, a decision based on the procedural grounds for transfer requests.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

Cererea a fost legal timbrată.

Se referă de către magistratul asistent asupra că potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită a fost judecat la 6 septembrie 2012, acest aspect reieșind și din adresa din 1 octombrie 2012, prin care petenta a solicitat respingerea cererii de strămutare ca fiind rămasă fără obiect, întrucât cauza a fost soluționată.

Având cuvântul, procuror A.B. pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea de strămutare a Dosarului nr. 7540/318/2010 al Judecătoriei Târgu-Jiu, formulată de petenta SC L. SA.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 3 octombrie 2012.