Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
Încheierea nr. 5524/2012 KI-generiert

Change of venue for suspended civil proceedings challenging authorized expert opinion

Geschäftsnummer Încheierea nr. 5524/2012
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Rumänien (RO)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The High Court of Cassation and Justice granted the petition for change of venue (strămutare), transferring the civil trial from the Olt Court of Appeal to the Sibiu Court of Appeal and preserving all procedural acts performed to date. The dispute involved a request by a corporate plaintiff to relocate the case based on an alleged procedural suspension under Article 40(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure and a challenge to a previous decision authorizing a new expert opinion, which the defendants and public prosecutor opposed. Relying on the provisions of Article 40(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding the grounds for changing the competent court, the Court dismissed the defenses of the defendant and ordered the transfer without leaving the decision open to appeal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ, art. 40 alin. (4) C. proc. civ; Change of venue for suspended civil proceedings challenging authorized expert opinion: The dispute involved a request by a corporate plaintiff to relocate the case based on an alleged procedural suspension under Article 40(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure and a challenge to a previous decision authorizing a new expert opinion, which the defendants and public prosecutor opposed. Relying on the provisions of Article 40(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding the grounds for changing the competent court, the Court dismissed the defenses of the defendant and ordered the transfer without leaving the decision open to appeal.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Zivilprozessverfahren Sachverständigengutachten Nichtigkeitsgründe Eröffnung des Verfahrens polizeilicher Grund Verfahrenshandlungen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 40 alin. (4) C. proc. civ.

Cited in the conclusion of the appellant and implicitly serving as the legal basis for the admission of the change of venue request, as it governs the grounds for transferring jurisdiction.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Procedura legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor Dosarul nr. 1467/104/2010 al Tribunalului Olt a cărui strămutare se solicită a fost suspendat în baza art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ.

Apărătorii petentei pun concluzii de admitere a cererii de strămutare, cu aplicarea dispozițiilor art. 40 alin. (4) C. proc. civ., în sensul desființării încheierii de încuviințare a unei noi expertize.

Intimatul pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de preschimbare.

Procurorul pune concluzii de admitere a cererii.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Admite cererea formulată de petenta SC A. SA privind strămutarea judecății procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 1467/104/2010 al Tribunalului Olt.

Strămută judecata pricinii de la Tribunalul Olt la Tribunalul Sibiu.

Păstrează actele de procedură îndeplinite.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 20 septembrie 2012.