Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
254/2015 KI-generiert

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for non-constitutionality due to improper procedural submission of the question.

Geschäftsnummer 254/2015
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Portugal (PT)
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court notified the appellant to respond regarding the rejection of their appeal for non-constitutionality. The court determined that the question of constitutionality was not raised in a procedurally adequate manner as required by law. Consequently, the court decided not to examine the merits of the constitutional complaint.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 221.º, n.º 1, alínea a), da CRP; Art. 222.º, n.º 1, alínea a), da CRP: The Constitutional Court will not examine a constitutional complaint if the question of constitutionality is not raised in a procedurally adequate manner.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Constitutional Court non-constitutionality appeal procedural adequacy improper submission rejection of appeal verspätete Einwendungen Rechtzeitigkeit des Ausstandsgesuchs Einrede der Verfassungswidrigkeit

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 221.º, n.º 1, alínea a), da CRP
Art. 222.º, n.º 1, alínea a), da CRP
KI-generiert
349/15
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to failure to specify appeal object and raise constitutional issue properly.
290/18
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for non-raise of normative constitutionality question before judgment.
38/12
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses request to review a conference decision as legally inadmissible.
696/2026
Constitutional court dismisses appeal against summary ruling for failing to review substantive constitutional issues.
1394/2025
Constitutional Court dismisses claim for review of lower court decision due to lack of normative object.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

ACÓRDÃO Nº 196/2016

Processo n.º 254/2015

3ª Secção

Relator: Conselheiro Carlos Fernandes Cadilha

Acordam, na 3.ª Secção, no Tribunal Constitucional

Acordam em notificar o recorrente para se pronunciar, querendo, quanto ao não conhecimento do objeto do recurso por não suscitação da questão de constitucionalidade de modo processualmente adequado

Lisboa, 13 de abril de 2016 - Carlos Fernandes Cadilha - Maria José Rangel de Mesquita - Lino Rodrigues Ribeiro - Catarina Sarmento e Castro - Maria Lúcia Amaral