Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
381/14 KI-generiert

Constitutional Court corrects a citation error in a previous ruling regarding the wrong precedent case number.

Geschäftsnummer 381/14
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Portugal (PT)
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court authorized a formal correction to a prior judgment (Acórdão n.º 308/2015) due to a clerical error in the cited case number. The relator identified that the text incorrectly referenced Acórdão n.º 265/2015 instead of the intended Acórdão n.º 264/2015. The court ruled that this specific writing defect required immediate rectification to ensure the legal reasoning remains clear and accurate.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 240.º do Código de Processo Constitucional; The Constitutional Court may order the correction of clerical errors in its own judgments when such mistakes obscure the meaning of the decided legal provisions.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
clerical error judgment correction Constitutional Court procedural rectification citation mistake legal text formal amendment Berichtigung des Entscheids

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 240.º do Código de Processo Constitucional

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
Acórdão n.º 308/2015
Portuguese Constitutional Court upholds civil court ruling denying opposition to execution based on non-existent commercial transaction.
Acórdão n.º 265/2015
Portuguese Constitutional Court rejects challenge to road transport fines, upholding administrative penalty system constitutionality.
Acórdão n.º 264/2015
Portuguese Constitutional Court declares Article 857(1) of Civil Procedure Code unconstitutional after three prior rulings.
KI-generiert
311/18.9T8PVZ.P1
Court rules surface right is perpetual without fixed term, dismissing claims for building ownership.
527/2013
Constitutional Court corrects a prior ruling's factual error regarding the absence of constitutional arguments.
840/2024
Constitutional Court corrects a clerical error in a previous ruling regarding Article 310 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
109/83
Constitutional Court corrects a prior ruling due to material errors in page and line citations.
1051/2025
Constitutional Court corrects a previous ruling's sumary decision number due to a manifest procedural error.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

ACÓRDÃO Nº 348/2015[1]

Processo n.º 381/14

2.ª Secção

Relator: Conselheiro Fernando Ventura

Acordam na 2.ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional

Proferido nestes autos o Acórdão n.º 308/2015, verifica-se que dele consta referência fundamentadora ao julgamento do Acórdão n.º 265/2015 quando, na realidade, se pretendia referir o Acórdão n.º 264/2015.

Importa corrigir o apontado lapso de escrita, passível de perturbar a perceção do decidido.

Assim, determina-se a seguinte retificação no texto do Acórdão n.º 308/2015

No ponto 6, onde se lê “naquele apreciado pelo Acórdão n.º 265/2015”, passe a constar “naquele apreciado pelo Acórdão n.º 264/2015”, fazendo menção do presente Acórdão.

Notifique.

Lisboa, 23 de junho de 2015 - Fernando Vaz Ventura - João Cura Mariano - Ana Guerra Martins - Pedro Machete - Joaquim de Sousa Ribeiro

[1] Retifica Acórdão 308/2015