Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
185-A/95 KI-generiert

Constitutional Court grants judge's recusal due to prior involvement in criminal case where claimant was a party.

Geschäftsnummer 185-A/95
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Portugal (PT)
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court granted the requested recusal for a judge who previously acted as a prosecutor in criminal proceedings involving the claimant. The claimant was a party in those earlier cases, which later resulted in criminal charges against the judge and other intervening magistrates. The court decided to allow the recusal based on the judge's prior intervention in the specific criminal matters where the claimant was involved.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 126, nº 1, CPC; Art. 127, nº 1, alínea c), CPC: A judge must recuse themselves if they previously intervened as a prosecutor in criminal proceedings where the claimant was a party, ensuring impartiality.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
judicial recusal prior prosecutorial role impartiality requirement conflict of interest CPC recusal rules strafrechtliches Revisionsverfahren Ermächtigung zur Strafverfolgung Rückzug des Strafantrags

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 126, nº 1, CPC
Art. 127, nº 1, alínea c), CPC
126, nº 1, do CPC, em referência ao art. 127, nº 1, alínea c), do mesmo diploma, solicita escusa para instruir a causa».
KI-generiert
108/12
Constitutional Court grants excuse for judge due to prior criminal prosecution involvement in related case.
490/93
Constitutional Court judges granted leave to recuse themselves due to being plaintiffs in a prior criminal case against a signatory.
482/06
Portuguese Constitutional Court grants judges' excuses due to prior criminal complaints against them.
664/15.0IDPRT-A.P1
Portuguese court grants judge's recusal due to pending disciplinary inquiry initiated by a party in the case.
679/17.4T9STS-C.P1
Portuguese court denies judge's recusal request based on a civil lawsuit filed against him.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Acórdão 375/07

ACÓRDÃO N.º 375/2007

Processo nº 185-A/95

3ª Secção

Relatora: Conselheira Ana Guerra Martins

(Conselheiro Carlos Fernandes Cadilha)

Acordam, na 3ª Secção, do Tribunal Constitucional

1. Nos presentes autos, vindos do Tribunal Cível do Porto, e em que é reclamante A., o Relator a quem os mesmos foram distribuídos – o Senhor Conselheiro Carlos Fernandes Cadilha – lavrou, em 30 de Maio de 2007, o seguinte despacho:

«O relator teve intervenção, enquanto Procurador da República do Círculo Judicial de Viana do Castelo, em processos-crime que correram termos na comarca-sede, em que o reclamante era parte interessada, e que originaram uma ulterior participação criminal em que o relator e todos os outros magistrados intervenientes eram visados, pelo que, nos termos do art. 126, nº 1, do CPC, em referência ao art. 127, nº 1, alínea c), do mesmo diploma, solicita escusa para instruir a causa».

2. Por despacho de 04 de Junho de 2007, o Exmo Senhor Vice-Presidente do Tribunal Constitucional determinou que o processo fosse concluso à ora relatora.

Cumpre, pois, lavrar acórdão, nos termos do nº 3 do artigo 29º da LTC.

3. Em face do exposto, este Tribunal decide conceder a escusa solicitada.

Lisboa, 28 de Junho de 2007

Ana Maria Guerra Martins

Maria Lúcia Amaral

Vítor Gomes

Gil Galvão