Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
1035/04 KI-generiert

Constitutional Council grants a judge's recusal request due to familial ties to a party.

Geschäftsnummer 1035/04
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Portugal (PT)
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Council granted a judge's request for recusal from a specific constitutional review case. The judge, Maria dos Prazeres Pizarro Beleza, invoked articles 29 and 69 of the Law on Constitutional Review, citing her status as an aunt to one of the parties. The court accepted this familial relationship as a valid ground for recusal to ensure impartiality.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Articles 29 and 69 of the Law on Constitutional Review; a judge must recuse themselves if they have a familial relationship with a party to the constitutional review.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
recusal request familial relationship constitutional review impartiality requirement judge disqualification Einrede der Verfassungswidrigkeit Verfahrensverzögerung der Staatsanwaltschaft Wiedererwägung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Article 70(1)(b) of Law No. 28/82
Article 29 of Law No. 28/82
Article 69 of Law No. 28/82
Article 127(1)(a) of the Civil Procedure Code
artigo 127º, nº 1, alínea a) do Código de Processo Civil
KI-generiert
159/97
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses unconstitutionality challenge to municipal waste fee regulation citing uniform precedent.
260/2019
Constitutional Court declares Article 9(4) of Decree-Law 287/93 unconstitutional for violating equality principle.
51/97
Portuguese Constitutional Court upholds municipal bylaw on waste fees against constitutional challenge.
102/14
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses claim that noise and electromagnetic fields violate personal integrity rights regardless of legal compliance.
TC_20040472
Constitutional Council dismisses a concrete review of a law's constitutionality due to a judge's conflict of interest.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Acórdão 705/04

ACÓRDÃO N.º 705/2004

Processo n.º 1035/04

3.ª Secção

Relator: Conselheiro Vítor Gomes

Acordam na 3.ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional:

Nos presentes autos de recurso de fiscalização concreta de constitucionalidade, interposto ao abrigo do artigo 70º, nº 1, alínea b), da Lei nº 28/82, de 15 de Novembro (LTC), em que é recorrente A. e recorrido o Ministério Público, a Senhora Conselheira Maria dos Prazeres Pizarro Beleza, a quem o recurso foi distribuído, veio solicitar escusa, invocando o disposto nos artigos 29º e 69º da LTC e no artigo 127º, nº 1, alínea a) do Código de Processo Civil e o facto de ser tia de um dos arguidos no processo principal.

Pelos fundamentos invocados, o Tribunal Constitucional decide deferir o pedido de escusa formulado pela Senhora Conselheira Maria dos Prazeres Pizarro Beleza.

Lisboa, 17 de Dezembro de 2004

Vítor Gomes

Gil Galvão

Bravo Serra

Artur Maurício