Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
1000/98 KI-generiert

Constitutional Court rejects clarification request citing no obscurity in the cited court passage.

Geschäftsnummer 1000/98
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Portugal (PT)
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court rejected the applicant's request for clarification regarding a specific passage in a prior judgment. The applicant argued the text was obscure, claiming the court failed to apply substantive and procedural norms. The court determined that reading the entire prior decision revealed no obscurity in the cited excerpt.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 22.º, n.º 1 da Lei Orgânica do Tribunal Constitucional; The Constitutional Court may reject a request for clarification when the cited passage is not actually obscure upon reading the full context of the decision.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Constitutional Court request for clarification obscurity of text judicial review procedural norms Bestimmtheit rechtlicher Normen fehlende Legitimation der Staatsanwaltschaft ungenügende Substantiierung von Grundrechtsverletzungen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 22.º, n.º 1 da Lei Orgânica do Tribunal Constitucional
KI-generiert
334/20
Constitutional Court rejects nullity claim for unclear reasoning in a constitutional admissibility decision.
1445/2017
Portuguese Constitutional Court rejects nullity claim against refusal of abstract constitutional review due to lack of normative question.
687/10
Constitutional Court rejects request to clarify a judgment due to lack of obscurity or ambiguity.
722/06
Constitutional Court rejects request for clarification and reform of prior decision regarding criminal procedure interpretation.
664/22
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses claim of nullity for omission of pronouncement due to inadmissible object.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Acórdão 652/99

ACÓRDÃO Nº 652/99

Processo nº 1000/98

3ª secção

Relatora: Maria dos Prazeres Beleza

Acordam, em conferência, na 3ª Secção do

Tribunal Constitucional:

Notificado do acórdão de fls. 1296, vem o recorrente L... requerer a sua aclaração, no requerimento de fls. 1303, considerando obscura a seguinte passagem:

"É que o acórdão recorrido [...] não aplicou, nem poderia aplicar, pois que considerou improcedente a arguição de nulidade por parte do ora reclamante, as normas de direito substantivo e processual que constituem o objecto do recurso de constitucionalidade".

Basta, todavia, ler a totalidade do acórdão para verificar que não enferma de nenhuma obscuridade o trecho transcrito.

Assim, indefere-se o pedido de aclaração.

Lisboa, 2 de Dezembro de 1999

Maria dos Prazeres Pizarro Beleza

Alberto Tavares da Costa

Luís Nunes de Almeida