Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
TC_19960479 KI-generiert

Constitutional Court dismisses public prosecution appeal without examining merits due to lack of procedural standing.

Geschäftsnummer TC_19960479
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Portugal (PT)
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court of Portugal decided not to examine the appeal filed by the Public Prosecution Service against a lower court judgment. The Public Prosecution argued for review based on the reporter's exposition, which referenced a prior decision, but the Court found no basis to intervene. Consequently, the appeal was rejected without a substantive ruling on the underlying case.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 220.º da Constituição da República Portuguesa; Art. 221.º da Lei Orgânica do Tribunal Constitucional: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to examine appeals filed by the Public Prosecution Service unless specific constitutional grounds are met, and in the absence thereof, the appeal is not taken into consideration.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Constitutional Court jurisdiction Public Prosecution appeal Procedural standing Non-examination of appeal Constitutional review scope Ausstand von Staatsanwälten Zuständigkeit der Staatsanwaltschaft Rechtsbehelfsverfahren

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 220.º da Constituição da República Portuguesa
Art. 221.º da Lei Orgânica do Tribunal Constitucional
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Acórdão 479/96

ACÓRDÃO Nº 479/96

Procº nº 798/95

Rel. Cons. Alves Correia

Acordam na 2ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional:

Nos presentes autos, vindos do Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Seixal, em que figuram como recorrente o Ministério Público e como recorrida A, pelo essencial dos fundamentos da Exposição do Relator de fls. 45 - a qual remete para o Acórdão deste Tribunal nº 8/96 e mereceu a concordância do recorrente -,decide‑se não tomar conhecimento do recurso.

Lisboa, 19 de Março de 1996

Fernando Alves Correia

Guilherme da Fonseca

José de Sousa e Brito

Bravo Serra

Luis Nunes de Almeida

Messias Bento

José Manuel Cardoso da Costa