Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
TC_19950662 KI-generiert

Constitutional court dismisses public prosecution appeal without examining merits due to procedural non-compliance.

Geschäftsnummer TC_19950662
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Portugal (PT)
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court of Portugal decided not to examine the appeal filed by the Public Prosecution Service against a lower court judgment. The Public Prosecution argued for a review of the case, but the court determined the appeal lacked the necessary procedural foundation to be considered. Consequently, the court formally rejected the request without addressing the substantive legal or factual arguments presented by either party.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 78-A LTC; Art. 220.1 Constitution: The Constitutional Court may decide not to examine an appeal if it is procedurally inadmissible or lacks the requisite legal standing, thereby preventing a merits review.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
procedural inadmissibility Constitutional Court jurisdiction Public Prosecution appeal non-examination decision Lisbon Tribunal Constitucional Anfechtbarkeit des Rückweisungsentscheids Rechtsbehelfsverfahren Ausstand von Staatsanwälten

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 78-A LTC
Art. 220.1 Constitution
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Acórdão 662/95

ACÓRDÃO Nº 662/95

Procº nº 423/95

2ª Secção

Rel.: Consº Luís Nunes de Almeida

Acordam na 2ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional:

No presente processo, vindo do Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Seixal, em que é recorrente o Ministério Público e recorrido A., pelas razões constantes do Acórdão nº 577/95, de que se encontra junta cópia aos autos, e em conformidade com a exposição do relator efectuada ao abrigo do artigo 78º-A da LTC, que mereceu inteira concordância da entidade recorrente, decide-se não tomar conhecimento do recurso.

Lisboa, 22 de Novembro de 1995

Luís Nunes de Almeida

Guilherme da Fonseca

Bravo Serra

Fernando Alves Correia

Messias Bento

José de Sousa e Brito

José Manuel Cardoso da Costa