Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
198/95 KI-generiert

Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for non-exhaustion of remedies due to ordinary nature of prior recourse.

Geschäftsnummer 198/95
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Portugal (PT)
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court of Portugal decided not to examine the appellant's request and ordered them to pay the costs. The appellant argued that the previous recourse to the Supreme Court of Justice was an ordinary remedy, but the court found this argument insufficient to justify further review. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the prior procedural step did not meet the requirements for Constitutional Court intervention.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 222.º da Constituição Portuguesa; Art. 223.º da Constituição Portuguesa: The Constitutional Court will not examine appeals where the prior recourse to the Supreme Court of Justice is considered an ordinary remedy rather than a specific constitutional challenge.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Constitutional Court exhaustion of remedies ordinary remedy Supreme Court of Justice procedural admissibility Beschwerdelegitimation ordentliches Verfahren prozessuale Einreden

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 222.º da Constituição Portuguesa
Art. 223.º da Constituição Portuguesa
KI-generiert
176/95
Constitutional court dismisses appeal for failing to cite a specific legal norm for unconstitutionality review.
684/04
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses claim for non-knowledge due to improper timing of constitutional question raising.
253/97
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for non-constitutional issue raised too late in nullity proceedings.
503/92
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for failing to raise constitutional issue at first instance.
271/10
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses claim for concrete constitutional review due to lack of proper procedural raising of the issue.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

ACÓRDÃO Nº 567/95

Processo nº 198/95

2ª Secção

Relator: Conselheiro Messias Bento

Acordam na 2ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional:

Nestes autos, em que é recorrente A. e recorridos B. e C.,

- pelo essencial dos fundamentos da exposição do relator, que aqui se têm por reproduzidos e que a resposta do recorrente não abalou (limitou-se a afirmar que o recurso para o Pleno do Supremo Tribunal de Justiça é um recurso ordinário),

- decide-se não tomar conhecimento do recurso e condenar o recorrente nas custas, com taxa de justiça que se fixa em doze unidades de conta.

Lisboa, 17 de Outubro de 1995

Messias Bento

Guilherme da Fonseca

Bravo Serra

Fernando Alves Correia

José de Sousa e Brito (vencido nos termos do Acórdão 181/93)

Luís Nunes de Almeida (vencido)

José Manuel Cardoso da Costa (vencido nos termos do Acórdão nº 181/93)