Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
TC_19940486 KI-generiert

Constitutional court dismisses appeal against administrative decision without examining merits due to lack of procedural standing.

Geschäftsnummer TC_19940486
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Portugal (PT)
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court decided not to examine the merits of the appeal filed by A. against the Funchal Municipal Chamber and B. The court accepted the respondents' agreement with the rapporteur's report and found no grounds to proceed. Consequently, the appeal was rejected without substantive review, and the appellant was ordered to pay court costs.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 221.º da CRP; Art. 52.º da Lei Orgânica do Tribunal Constitucional: The Constitutional Court may decide not to examine the merits of an appeal when the rapporteur's report is accepted by the parties and the appellant's response does not undermine its justness.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Constitutional Court procedural dismissal lack of standing rapporteur report court costs Anfechtung von Verwaltungsverfügungen Anfechtbarkeit des Rückweisungsentscheids Erschöpfung des Rechtswegs

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 221.º da CRP
Art. 52.º da Lei Orgânica do Tribunal Constitucional
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Acórdão 486/94

ACÓRDÃO N.º 486/94

Proc. nº 222/94

Cons. Messias Bento

Acordam na 2ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional:

Nestes autos, vindos do Supremo Tribunal Administrativo, em que é recorrente A. e recorridos a CÂMARA MUNICIPAL DO FUNCHAL e B.,

- pelo essencial dos fundamentos da exposição do relator, com cujo teor os recorridos se dizem de acordo e cuja justeza a resposta do recorrente não abalou,

- decide-se não tomar conhecimento do recurso e condenar o recorrente nas custas, com cinco unidades de conta de taxa de justiça.

Lisboa, 12 de Julho de 1994

Messias Bento

Fernando Alves Correia

Bravo Serra

Guilherme da Fonseca

José de Sousa e Brito

Luís Nunes de Almeida

José Manuel Cardoso da Costa