Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
32/93 KI-generiert

Constitutional Court rejects request to correct a prior ruling due to lack of legal remedy for non-appealable decisions.

Geschäftsnummer 32/93
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Portugal (PT)
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court rejected the applicant's request to correct a previous ruling that had denied his appeal. The applicant argued the prior decision contained judicial errors regarding factual foundations, citing legal scholarship. However, the court held that since the original decision was not appealable, no legal remedy existed to challenge it.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 24.º da CRP; Art. 52.º da CRP: When a judicial decision is final and non-appealable, the absence of a legal remedy precludes any request for correction of that decision, even if alleged judicial errors exist.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
finality of judgments lack of legal remedy correction of rulings non-appealable decisions constitutional review limits Anfechtbarkeit des Rückweisungsentscheids Berichtigung des Entscheids Anfechtung von Zwischenentscheiden

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 24.º da CRP
Art. 52.º da CRP
KI-generiert
747/04
Constitutional Court rejects clarification request for clear decision on procedural exhaustion of constitutional challenges.
1402/17
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses nullity appeal for failure to apply cited civil procedure articles.
TC_20040157
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses claim that lower court failed to rule on constitutional issue.
879/14
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal against judicial decision regarding unconstitutional interpretation of law.
413/2020
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses claim for review of domestic violence conviction based on retroactive law application.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Acórdão 637/93

ACÓRDÃO N.º 637/93

Processo n.º 32/93

2.ª Secção

Relator: Conselheiro Luís Nunes de Almeida

Acordam na 2.ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional:

A. vem requerer a rectificação do Acórdão nº 404/93, onde se não admitiu recurso por ele interposto, por o recorrente não ter invocado a inconstitucionalidade de qualquer norma durante o processo, com fundamento em que aquela decisão «comete erro judicial ao referir fundamentos desconformes com a realidade fáctica constante dos autos (Castro Mendes, Direito Proc Civil, AAFDL, 1980, vol III, pag 304».

Sem mais, se dirá que, ainda que, supostamente, o recorrente tivesse razão quanto a existência de erro judicial, a verdade é que, como ensina Castro Mendes, contra ele, quando da decisão não caiba recurso, não há meio de reacção.

Pelo exposto, indefere-se o requerido, fixando-se a taxa de justiça em dez unidades de conta.

Lisboa, 4 de Novembro de 1993

Luís Nunes de Almeida

Messias Bento

Bravo Serra

Fernando Alves Correia

José de Sousa de Brito

José Manuel Cardoso da Costa