Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II UZ 62/11 KI-generiert

Supreme Court quashes appeal decision rejecting request for reasoned judgment due to missed deadline.

Geschäftsnummer II UZ 62/11
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Teilweise gutgeheissen (Partially Allowed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court quashed the appellate court's decision rejecting the applicant's request for a reasoned judgment and service of the verdict. The applicant argued that the deadline for filing an appeal should only begin after the court addressed the request to restore the missed deadline for the reasoned judgment. The court held that the appellate court failed to evaluate whether the missed deadline was caused by the applicant's fault, violating the duty of due diligence.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 387 § 3 k.p.c.; Art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.; Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 398 § 21 k.p.c. - The court must assess whether a missed procedural deadline was caused by the party's fault; failure to do so prevents proper review of the decision rejecting the request for a reasoned judgment.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
procedural deadline reasoned judgment duty of due diligence fault-based dismissal appellate review service of verdict restoration of term

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 387 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 21 k.p.c.
art. 387 § 3 k.p.c
art. 391 § 1 k.p.c
art. 3941 § 2 k.p.c

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext