Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II UZ 28/07 KI-generiert

Supreme Court quashes appeal court order for failure to inform unrepresented party of right to reasoned judgment.

Geschäftsnummer II UZ 28/07
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Teilweise gutgeheissen (Partially Allowed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court quashed the appeal court's decision rejecting the insured's request to restore the deadline for requesting a reasoned judgment. The insured, acting without legal counsel, missed the deadline after being told the judgment was final but could be appealed via an attorney, without receiving specific instructions on requesting the reasoning. The court held that informing a party about the mandatory attorney requirement does not equate to informing them of their right to a reasoned judgment, necessitating a new hearing to assess the missed deadline.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 327 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 387 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 387 § 3 k.p.c.: In proceedings where an appeal is dismissed, the court must inform an unrepresented party of their right to request a reasoned judgment; mere notification of the attorney requirement does not satisfy this obligation.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
reasoned judgment request restoration of deadline unrepresented party mandatory attorney rule procedural notification

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 327 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 387 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 387 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 391 § 1 k.p.c
art. 871 k.p.c
art. 387 § 1 k.p.c
art. 387 § 3 k.p.c
art. 168 § 1 k.p.c

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext