I PZ 1/07
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; filing deadline not extended by request for court-appointed counsel.
Polen (PL)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against a lower court's rejection of a request for a court-appointed lawyer. The appellant argued that the filing deadline should start from the date of the lawyer's appointment rather than the original notice. The court held that the statutory deadline runs from the date of service and is not interrupted or extended by a subsequent request for counsel, though such a request may justify restoring the deadline.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 394 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.: The time limit for filing an appeal runs from the date of service and is not interrupted or extended by a party's request for a court-appointed lawyer, although such a request may serve as grounds for restoring the deadline.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
court-appointed lawyer
filing deadline
appeal procedure
time limit interruption
restoration of deadline
court-appointed counsel
service of notice
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 394 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
art. 871 § 1 k.p.c
art. 130 § 5 k.p.c
art. 5 k.p.c
art. 394 § 2 k.p.c
art. 370 k.p.c
art. 39814 k.p.c
art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertII CZ 35/97
II CZ 106/98
I CZ 76/00
II CZ 81/02
V CZ 42/03
I CZ 4/04