I BP 15/06
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismisses claim for interest as contrary to social norms due to employer's partial payment.
Polen (PL)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for interest on a severance payment, ruling it contrary to social norms. The employer had already made significant partial payments and prioritized job protection over the specific plaintiff's interest. The court held that such claims require a particularly obvious violation of law to be upheld.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 8 k.p.; Art. 42411 § 1 k.p.c.: A claim for interest may be dismissed if it is contrary to social norms, provided the court finds no particularly obvious violation of law justifying the award.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
social norms
interest on severance
partial payment
judicial discretion
contrary to law
employer liability
supreme court review
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 8 k.p.
Art. 42411 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 5 k.c.
Art. 4244 k.p.c.
art. 8 k.p
art. 388 k.p.c
art. 391 § 1 k.p.c
art. 481 § 1 k.c
art. 300 k.p
art. 382 k.p.c
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertII CKN 665/98
III CZP 8/69
II BP 3/05
Supreme Court dismissed appeal for non-compliance with law regarding late statute of limitations objection.
II BP 1/05
Supreme Court dismissed appeal claiming final judgment violated law due to ambiguous regulation interpretation.
IV CNP 25/05
Supreme Court dismissed appeal claiming legal inconsistency, ruling errors require obvious judicial misinterpretation.
I PK 558/02
Supreme Court dismisses cassation as no general legal issue exists regarding general clauses in labor law.
I PR 415/67
III PZP 34/73
III PRN 39/70
III CKN 339/98
I CKN 837/00
IV CK 151/02