Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I UZ 33/05 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses appeal for filing late, ruling statutory deadlines run continuously despite appointed counsel changes.

Geschäftsnummer I UZ 33/05
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the insured's appeal against a social security disability pension decision, ruling the appeal was filed outside the statutory one-month deadline. The appellant argued the deadline should restart upon the appointment of a new court-appointed lawyer, but the court held that such appointments do not interrupt the continuous running of procedural time limits. Consequently, the court determined that the appellant failed to file the appeal within the legally prescribed period and could not rely on the appointment of new counsel to justify the delay.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.; The statutory one-month period for filing a cassation appeal runs continuously and is not interrupted or suspended by the appointment of new court-appointed counsel, unless a specific request for time restoration is filed.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
cassation appeal deadline court appointed counsel continuous time limit procedural time restoration social security pension Supreme Court ruling statutory time bar

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 k.p.c.
Art. 397 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 3934 § 1 k.p.c
art. 168 § 1 k.p.c
art. 385 k.p.c

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext