Supreme Court quashes appeal judgment regarding application of Civil Code to previously agreed compensation and interest.

The Supreme Court partially quashed the appellate judgment, remanding the case for reconsideration on specific points. The appellant argued that the lower court failed to properly apply Article 3581 § 3 of the Civil Code regarding interest capitalization and misclassified a prior payment as a set-off rather than a partial performance. The court found the legal reasoning flawed because the distinction between the main debt's nominal value and the interest owed was not correctly addressed, and the set-off analysis ignored the nature of the prior payment as a settlement of previous periods.