I PK 68/05
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; indefinite contract cannot transform to fixed-term without explicit statutory provision.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal, quashing the lower court's decision that transformed an indefinite-term employment contract into a fixed-term one. The plaintiff argued that a five-year service period automatically converted the contract, while the employer contended the original agreement remained indefinite. The court ruled that Article 58 of the Civil Code does not permit such a transformation by operation of law, as no specific statute authorizes it.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 58 § 1, § 3 k.c.; A change in the terms of an employment contract by operation of law requires a specific statutory provision, and the Civil Code does not authorize the transformation of an indefinite-term contract into a fixed-term one.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
employment contract transformation
indefinite term contract
fixed term contract
operation of law
Civil Code Article 58
labor law supremacy
statutory authorization
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 58 § 3 k.c.
Art. 58 § 1 k.c.
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 385 k.p.c
art. 58 § 3 k.c
art. 3931 k.p.c
art. 45 § 1 k.p
art. 382 k.p.c
art. 68 § 2 k.p
art. 68 k.p