Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II UZ 53/05 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses appeal; court has no duty to inform appointed counsel of deadline expiry.

Geschäftsnummer II UZ 53/05
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's appeal against the appellate court's refusal to restore a missed cassation deadline. The applicant argued that the court violated procedural rules by failing to inform her appointed counsel of the deadline, while the appellate court held the delay resulted from the counsel's own negligence. The Supreme Court ruled that the law does not impose an obligation on the court to notify counsel of the deadline, and the delay was not excusable given the case's simplicity and the counsel's actions.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.; art. 3934 k.p.c.; The court is not obliged to inform an appointed counsel of the expiration of the cassation deadline, and such failure cannot serve as a basis for restoring a missed deadline.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
missed cassation deadline appointed counsel duty court notification obligation procedural restoration negligence of counsel

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 3934 k.p.c.
art. 3941 k.p.c.
art. 397 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
art. 168 § 1 k.p.c
art. 169 § 1 k.p.c
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 361 k.p.c
art. 3934 k.p.c

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext