II PK 186/04
KI-generiert
Employer must pay non-compete damages monthly if contract terms are silent on payment schedule.
Polen (PL)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a lower court judgment regarding non-compete damages. The employer argued the non-compete agreement was void due to a lack of essential information, while the court found the employee had access to necessary company data. The court ruled that the employer's obligation to pay damages updates according to the contract's payment terms or, if unspecified, monthly installments aligned with salary payments.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertart. 1012 § 3 k.p.; art. 481 § 1 k.c.; art. 300 k.p.: The employer's obligation to pay damages for non-compete behavior updates according to terms agreed in the contract, or if no terms are set, in monthly installments consistent with salary payment periods.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
non-compete agreement
damages payment terms
monthly installments
labor law
salary payment periods
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertart. 1012 § 3 k.p.
art. 481 § 1 k.c.
art. 300 k.p.
art. 1012 § 3 k.p
art. 488 § 1 k.c
art. 1012 § 1 k.p
art. 300 k.p
art. 481 § 1 k.c