Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I UK 160/04 KI-generiert

Social security appeal dismissed for attempting to reframe the claim by proving only partial pension eligibility conditions.

Geschäftsnummer I UK 160/04
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Maria W. against a social security office decision denying her teacher's pension. The lower court had ruled that while the applicant did not meet the specific transition requirements under the Teachers' Card Act, she satisfied other general conditions. The Supreme Court held that in separate proceedings regarding pension appeals, Article 193 of the Civil Procedure Code prohibits transforming the claim by requesting the court to establish only some of the conditions necessary for the right to benefits.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 193 k.p.c.; Art. 13 § 2 k.p.c.; In separate proceedings concerning appeals against social security decisions, it is inadmissible to transform the subject matter of the claim by requesting the court to ascertain only certain prerequisites for the right to benefits.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
social security appeal pension eligibility subject matter transformation separate proceedings Teachers' Card Act civil procedure code inadmissible claim

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 193 k.p.c.
Art. 13 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 476 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 88 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 26 stycznia 1982 r. Karta Nauczyciela
Art. 83 ust. 1 pkt 4 ustawy o FUS
art. 193 k.p.c
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 391 § 1 k.p.c
art. 378 § 1 k.p.c
art. 13 § 2 k.p.c

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z 3 listopada 1994 r., I PZP 45/94
uchwała z 19 marca 2003 r., III ZP 1/03
wyrok z dnia 17 grudnia 1997 r., I PKN 434/97
wyrok z dnia 23 lutego 1999 r., I PKN 597/98
wyrok z dnia 19 września 2000 r., II UKN 725/99

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext