II UK 452/03
KI-generiert
Civil claim dismissed as statute of limitations expired; employer's conduct not inherently unlawful. Claim barred by 10-year limit from employment end date.
Polen (PL)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding a compensation claim for occupational lung disease. The plaintiff argued the claim was not time-barred, but the Court held the limitation period expired ten years after the employment relationship ended in 1965. The Court determined that the employer's conduct, while causing harm, did not constitute a criminal offense requiring the extended ten-year limitation period from the crime's commission date.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 442 k.c.; Art. 6 k.k.; A civil claim for damages arising from an act prohibited by law is subject to a three-year limitation period from discovery, unless the act constitutes a crime, in which case the period is ten years from the act's commission, not the consequence.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
statute of limitations
occupational disease
civil compensation
criminal act definition
limitation period calculation
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 442 k.c.
Art. 6 k.k.
Art. 101 § 3 k.k.
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 442 k.c
art. 5 k.c
art. 442 § 2 k.c
art. 442 § 1 k.c
art. 115 § 1 k.k
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertII PZP 3/96
Civil Code Art. 442 § 1: Statute of limitations for occupational disease compensation begins at job cessation, not discovery.
II PZP 1/96
II UKN 387/97
II UKN 292/98
II UKN 237/99
II UKN 635/99
Supreme Court dismissed cassation; Civil Code applies to occupational disease claims barred by Workers' Protection Act.
III CZP 43/68
III CZP 118/92