I PK 282/03
KI-generiert
Supreme Court rules dismissal allowed when new pay rules apply after effective notice date of dismissal.
Polen (PL)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court partially dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding unpaid severance and salary for the notice period. The court found that while the dismissal was effective upon delivery of the notice, the new pay regulation applied after that date. Consequently, the employee is entitled only to the pre-dismissal salary rate for the notice period, not the higher post-dismissal rate.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 70 § 2 k.p.; Art. 61 k.c. w związku z art. 70 § 1 i § 11 k.p. oraz w związku z art. 300 k.p.: A dismissal from a position becomes effective only upon delivery allowing the employee to review the notice, and a change in pay regulations occurring after this effective date does not entitle the employee to a higher salary for the notice period.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
dismissal from position
notice period salary
pay regulation change
effective date of notice
labor law interpretation
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertart. 70 § 2 zdanie drugie k.p.
art. 61 k.c. w związku z art. 70 § 1 i § 11 k.p. oraz w związku z art. 300 k.p.
art. 39313 k.p.c.
art. 108 § 2 k.p.c. w związku z art. 39319 k.p.c.
art. 70 k.p
art. 61 k.c
art. 300 k.p
art. 70 § 2 k.p
art. 772 § 5 k.p
art. 24113 § 1 k.p
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertuchwała Sądu Najwyższego z 8 listopada 1988 r., III PZP 34/88
uchwała siedmiu sędziów Sądu Najwyższego z 16 maja 1991, I PZP 3/91
wyrok Sądu Apelacyjnego w 6 Katowicach z 7 października 1992 r., III APr 54/92