I PK 49/02
KI-generiert
Employer may re-terminate contract without employee consent after invalid first termination.
Polen (PL)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court quashed the lower court's dismissal of the employee's claim to reinstate her employment. The court found that the employer's initial termination was invalid due to a breach of a notarial agreement restricting dismissals for two years, yet the employer subsequently issued a new termination notice. The court ruled that a valid re-termination is permissible without the employee's consent to withdraw the first notice, as each termination constitutes a distinct legal act independent of the prior one.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 10 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 393 § 13 k.p.c.: An employer may re-terminate an employment contract without the employee's consent to withdraw a previous termination, as each termination notice constitutes a separate legal act.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
re-termination of employment
invalid first termination
employee consent withdrawal
notarial agreement breach
separate legal acts
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 10 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 13 k.p.c.
art. 363 k.p.c
art. 61 k.c
art. 300 k.p
art. 363 § 1 k.p.c
art. 365 § 1 k.p.c
art. 370 k.p.c
art. 369 k.p.c
art. 39313 k.p.c