I PKN 693/00
KI-generiert
Failure to appeal employer's termination within the legal deadline dismisses the employee's reinstatement claim regardless of termination legality.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee seeking reinstatement after his employer terminated his contract due to theft. The employee argued that his medical leave prevented him from appealing the termination decision within the statutory timeframe. The court ruled that missing the appeal deadline under Article 264 of the Labor Code automatically bars the claim, rendering the substantive legality of the termination irrelevant.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 264 § 2 KP; Art. 265 § 1, 2 KP: Failure by an employee to appeal an employer's termination of the employment contract within the prescribed period excludes the need to examine the legality or justification of the termination grounds.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
Labor Code appeal deadline
Employment contract termination
Reinstatement claim dismissal
Statutory time limit
Labor dispute cassation
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 264 § 2 KP
Art. 265 § 1 and 2 KP
Art. 52 § 1 pkt 2 KP
Art. 393 § 12 KPC
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertI PKN 58/97, OSNAPiUS 1997 Nr 22, poz. 436