Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I PZ 85/00 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismissed appeal on appeal deadline restoration as inadmissible under specific procedural rules.

Geschäftsnummer I PZ 85/00
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the lower court's rejection of a request to restore the deadline for filing an appeal. The appellant, represented by a newly appointed lawyer, argued that the initial lawyer's notification was delayed and that the request was filed as quickly as possible, but the lower court found no sufficient justification under the Civil Procedure Code. The Supreme Court ruled that the appeal against the rejection of the deadline restoration request was procedurally inadmissible because the law only permits appeals against rejections of the appeal itself, not against procedural orders regarding the appeal's filing.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 380, Art. 39319 KPC; An appeal against a court order rejecting a request to restore the deadline for filing an appeal is inadmissible, as the Supreme Court may only review appeals against orders rejecting the appeal itself.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Civil Procedure Code appeal deadline restoration inadmissible appeal procedural order Supreme Court jurisdiction

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 380 KPC
Art. 39319 KPC
Art. 397 KPC
Art. 169 § 1 KPC
Art. 171 KPC
Art. 3934 KPC
art. 45 Konstytucji

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext