Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II UZ 113/00 KI-generiert

Polish Supreme Court dismisses appeal where late lawyer appointment does not reset filing deadlines due to client negligence.

Geschäftsnummer II UZ 113/00
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against a second-instance court's rejection of her request to reinstate the cassation deadline. The appellant had been properly notified of the deadline but failed to file a lawyer or request an extension until three days before expiration. The court ruled that merely appointing a lawyer late does not reopen the filing period because the delay was caused by the appellant's own unjustified inactivity.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 168 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 § 19 KPC: The appointment of a lawyer ex officio filed shortly before a deadline expires does not constitute a valid ground for reinstating the missed filing period if the delay was caused by the party's own unjustified inactivity.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
reinstatement of deadline inactivity of the party appointment of lawyer ex officio cassation procedure fault of the party

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 168 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 19 KPC
Art. 385 KPC

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
II CKN 724/99

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext