Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II UKN 21/99 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses appeal on occupational disability pension due to medical improvement and lack of procedural guidance violation.

Geschäftsnummer II UKN 21/99
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Mark W. against a decision denying his occupational disability pension. The lower courts found that the applicant's occupational asthma no longer caused respiratory insufficiency or disability, and his knee issues were unrelated to his work injury. The court ruled that the applicant did not require specific procedural guidance regarding new expert opinions because the medical evidence already conclusively established the absence of occupational disability.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 5 KPC; Art. 393 § 1 KPC: The obligation to provide necessary procedural guidance applies only when a party without legal representation would be deprived of influence on the process; the court is not required to inform parties about evidence not essential to the established facts.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
occupational disability pension medical improvement procedural guidance expert opinion evidence cassation appeal dismissal

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 5 KPC
Art. 78 of the Act on Pension Provision for Employees and Their Families
Art. 87 of the Act on Pension Provision for Employees and Their Families
Art. 18 of the Act on Occupational Injuries and Diseases
Art. 393 § 1 KPC

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext