Supreme Court dismisses appeal on occupational disability pension due to medical improvement and lack of procedural guidance violation.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Mark W. against a decision denying his occupational disability pension. The lower courts found that the applicant's occupational asthma no longer caused respiratory insufficiency or disability, and his knee issues were unrelated to his work injury. The court ruled that the applicant did not require specific procedural guidance regarding new expert opinions because the medical evidence already conclusively established the absence of occupational disability.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 5 KPC; Art. 393 § 1 KPC: The obligation to provide necessary procedural guidance applies only when a party without legal representation would be deprived of influence on the process; the court is not required to inform parties about evidence not essential to the established facts.