Supreme Court quashes appeal judgment for failing to resolve expert opinion contradictions via oral clarification under Civil Procedure Code.

The Supreme Court quashed the appellate court's judgment and remanded the case for a new decision on costs. The applicant argued that contradictions between expert opinions and his treating physician's report required an oral clarification under the Civil Procedure Code. The court held that the appellate court improperly relied on conflicting expert opinions without first resolving these discrepancies through an oral supplement, violating procedural fairness.