Supreme Court reversed dismissal of reinstatement claim, ruling factual findings insufficient to prove non-utility of return. The court held that the lower court failed to establish facts required by law to deny reinstatement. Consequently, the employee was ordered back to work on original terms.

The Supreme Court reversed the lower court's dismissal of the employee's claim for reinstatement to his former hospital position. The lower court had found that the employee's unauthorized travel and car breakdown constituted a serious breach of duty, justifying termination without notice. The Supreme Court ruled that the lower court failed to conduct the necessary factual inquiries to determine if reinstatement would be non-utility under the relevant labor law provision. As a result, the employee was ordered to be reinstated to his previous position, while the claim for lost wages was remanded for further proceedings.