Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I PKN 596/98 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses late appeal request due to client's own negligence in appointing counsel.

Geschäftsnummer I PKN 596/98
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal because the client failed to appoint legal counsel in a timely manner, causing the appeal to be filed after the deadline. Although the client argued that the holiday period justified the delay and that the lawyer's appointment should reset the timeline, the court held that the client bears responsibility for their own negligence. The decision established that without valid reasons, a party cannot extend procedural deadlines by appointing counsel after the original period has expired.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 393 2 KPC; Art. 169 § 1 KPC: A party's own negligence or indecision in appointing counsel does not justify restoring a procedural deadline if the appointment occurs after the original period has expired.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
procedural deadline counsel appointment client negligence cassation appeal time restoration legal representation court procedure

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 393 2 KPC
Art. 169 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 5 KPC
Art. 393 4 KPC
Art. 393 12 KPC
Art. 393 8 § 2 KPC
Art. 168 § 1 KPC

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
I CZ 138/71

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext