Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II UKN 247/98 KI-generiert

Cassation dismissed as inadmissible because the second-instance court failed to rule on the plaintiff's full claim without a request for supplementation.

Geschäftsnummer II UKN 247/98
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court rejected the cassation appeal filed by Andrzej K. against a partial judgment in an employment accident compensation case. The lower court altered the first-instance ruling but omitted a decision on the plaintiff's remaining claim for increased disability compensation, which neither party requested to be supplemented. The court held that since no party asked for the judgment to be completed within the statutory period, the cassation targeted a non-existent ruling and was therefore inadmissible under the Civil Procedure Code.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

art. 351, art. 3938 KPC: If a court of the second instance fails to rule on the entirety of a party's claim without a request for supplementation, a cassation appeal against such a partial judgment is inadmissible as it targets a non-existent ruling.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
inadmissible cassation partial judgment supplementation request non-existent ruling Civil Procedure Code employment accident disability compensation

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
art. 351 KPC
art. 3938 KPC

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
C 1040/52
4 CR 1188/56
I PR 10/63
I PR 75/71
II URN 144/82
II CKN 15/97
I CZ 76/97
I CKU 51/97
III CZ 43/98
II URN 136/82
III PZP 14/72
uchwała z dnia 30 kwietnia 1966 r., III PZP 15/66

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext