Supreme Court dismisses appeal when lawyer's power of attorney lacks specific authorization for cassation instance.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the rejection of their cassation. The appellant's lawyer submitted a power of attorney that, despite containing a printed general clause, had handwritten additions limiting its scope to the first and second instances. The court held that the lawyer failed to provide a separate authorization for the cassation instance, which is a mandatory requirement under the Code of Civil Procedure. Consequently, the cassation was inadmissible due to the lack of proper representation for that specific procedural stage.