Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II UKN 238/97 KI-generiert

Appeal misdirected to wrong court after proper notice does not justify missing statutory deadline under Polish Civil Procedure Code.

Geschäftsnummer II UKN 238/97
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a worker against a decision denying his request to restore the appeal deadline. The lower courts found that although the applicant's mother mailed the appeal to the wrong court, the applicant had been properly informed of the correct procedure and failed to exercise due diligence. The Supreme Court held that this error constituted negligence rather than a procedural violation warranting relief, thus upholding the dismissal of the appeal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 369 § 1 KPC; Art. 392 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 § 12 KPC: Misdirection of an appeal to the wrong court after proper notice of procedure constitutes negligence and does not justify restoration of the deadline.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
civil procedure code appeal deadline misdirected appeal due diligence cassation appeal procedural negligence restoration of term

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 369 § 1 KPC
Art. 382 KPC
Art. 168 § 1 KPC
Art. 168 § 2 KPC
Art. 468 KPC
Art. 392 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 12 KPC

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext