Supreme Court dismissed cassation, upholding lower courts' finding that the employer failed to terminate the employment contract within the statutory one-month period.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal against a labor court judgment ordering the reinstatement of an employee. The appellant argued that the employer incorrectly calculated the one-month notice period required for termination, claiming the clock should have started later based on new evidence. The court ruled that factual findings made during a properly conducted evidentiary procedure cannot be successfully challenged on cassation and that the employer failed to prove the notice period began after the end of November 1995.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 393 § 1 KPC; Art. 233 § 1 KPC; Art. 52 § 1, 2 KP: A cassation appeal cannot be based on questioning facts established in a properly conducted evidentiary procedure, and the statutory notice period for termination must be calculated from the date the employer became aware of the grounds for termination unless proven otherwise.