Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I PKN 25/97 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismissed cassation, upholding lower courts' finding that the employer failed to terminate the employment contract within the statutory one-month period.

Geschäftsnummer I PKN 25/97
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal against a labor court judgment ordering the reinstatement of an employee. The appellant argued that the employer incorrectly calculated the one-month notice period required for termination, claiming the clock should have started later based on new evidence. The court ruled that factual findings made during a properly conducted evidentiary procedure cannot be successfully challenged on cassation and that the employer failed to prove the notice period began after the end of November 1995.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 393 § 1 KPC; Art. 233 § 1 KPC; Art. 52 § 1, 2 KP: A cassation appeal cannot be based on questioning facts established in a properly conducted evidentiary procedure, and the statutory notice period for termination must be calculated from the date the employer became aware of the grounds for termination unless proven otherwise.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
labor law termination statutory notice period cassation appeal dismissal evidentiary procedure employment contract validity

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 393 § 1 KPC
Art. 233 § 1 KPC
Art. 52 § 1 KP
Art. 52 § 2 KP
Art. 393 § 2 KPC

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext